Monthly Archive for October, 2008

Infamous Art

I submit a poem inspired by the art of Stephen Gammell, which breathed “life macabre” into one of my favorite childhood book series.

Ghouls and ghosts and creeps unite!
Look at the way the moon alights
Shadowing our length among the trees,
We’re festooned about the canopied eaves,
Leering down from dead-leaf heights
–Sneering at the grownups affright
To worldly economic unease
As their children group like Ovis aries
Chewing toward their dental blight.
Adults, let not your fears decease
Your offspring be ours Halloween night.

Francis Collins’ Politcal Coming-out

The former head of the National Human Genome Research Institute wrote an op-ed in the Virginia-Pilot endorsing Barack Obama for president. The Pilot has a modest readership of 186,500, is losing its local ownership to a national news conglomerate, and competes with The Daily Press in a tri-county region of 1.7 million, many of which military.

Collins, a Virginia native, is a moderately well-known scientist–lodged somewhere between Steven Pinker and E.O. Wilson in the national conscious. Using his hometown paper as his moment of political coming-out, instead of the more obvious New York Times, makes some sense. However, his keeping-it-real gesture and his timing are not without political merit. The majority of American’s polled who actually watched the last debate said Obama swept the floor with McCain’s hairplugs. On the day Collins’ article was published Obama had a 12 point lead over McCain in this Tracking Poll. Not only is McCain unpopular, but Obama’s numbers haven’t fallen below 50 this month.

The Virginia-Pilot doesn’t make op-eds available online, so I placed a scanned copy below. The format is typical: begin with a few statistics to add legitimacy then proscribe away. But this is an op-ed piece, and Collins opines gingerly, outlining Obama’s outline of science and technology initiatives in a soon to be Democrat controlled White House and Congress. Ho-hum.

After suffering under the yolk of an Administration whose politicization of science sunk to never-before-seen fathoms, whose cronyism filled environmental regulatory agencies with corporate foxes–and whose political litmus tests blacklisted others from hundreds of federal advisory committees–whose cynicism cravenly kowtowed to a small yet annoying coterie of fundamentalist retards, thus allowing the actual, unthinkable possibility of creationism entering the classroom–and the no less shameful banning of human stem cell research and ignorant cautioning against creating ungodly chimeric abominations in the laboratory, whose systematic misrepresentation of the data muzzled its own–and in some cases had them fired–when their results didn’t jive with republican talking points, and whose initial failing to fill key scientific posts, such as naming a presidential science adviser and NIH director, was a damaging sanction placed upon every American scientist from day one. Taken together this is a vile epidemic and Collins the M.D. rises to the occasion:

As a citizen, a scientist, a physician and a son of Virginia, I am deeply concerned about these trends and continued lack of National leadership.

Whoa! Now that Collins has resigned, free of the Hatch Act that checks the mouths of all federal employees (ahem), he wastes no time charging in, guns blazing, with strong words for the current Administration’s bad ideas and McCain’s identical ones. Behold more righteous indignation:

I regret to say that I have found little comfort in Sen. John McCain’s plan.

Hot dog. Them’s fighting words. Or, this is a political maneuver to curry favor with the next president. And as with all politcal maneuvers, there’s a rush to the middle-ground: that wasteland of words, that Clintonian triangulation of opaque rhetoric. For the last eight years Collins collected a paycheck from the federal government, was witness in real-time to the damage done, and no-doubt felt the financial strangulation of basic research in his own institute for close to a decade. And now, his first public response is barely a vertebrae above spineless, a wag of the finger. I say, if you want to play politics, go in whole hog or don’t go in at all.

Seminar Answer Flow Chart

I found this over at evolgen inspired by the Sarah Palin Debate Flow Chart. They left out the unlikely situation that you already know the answer to the question. Then you can condescendingly say “That’s the wrong question. What you really want to ask is this: (insert canned question and answer)”

That’s one of my favorites.

Frogger

Mostly what they call heroes are just those that do, that are called to action when everyone else is standing around. This happens surprisingly often. It happened to me last week. I’m a doer.She was standing by the curb with the rest of us. I noticed a small break in the traffic in the near right lane. Then, and as I told the paramedics, for no apparent reason she stepped down from the curb as if to cross the street. It made no sense. Even a child would know not to walk across the street when she did. It’s like that videogame “Frogger,” except whoever had the joystick, because she obviously wasn’t working the controls, didn’t have her hop front to back, side to side. She just set out in a straight, hurried line. My guess was drugs or maybe she was one of those mental patients with a nervous brain that speed-lope wherever they’re going. Either way, there she went, and to look at her walking away was to look at someone whose next and last step would have immediate and life-altering consequences.

She wasn’t from around here—an Indian I think. And no, not like the football team. A Hindu or something. Her hair was braided down her back, and she was wearing this billowy off-white blouse, like an old bed sheet, down to her feet. She was also wearing tennis shoes, I remember, because one of them flew clean off.

In my peripheral, as she set out to cross the street, I made a move to jump out with her—just one of those numb lemming mentalities—but caught myself in mid-stride. I watched her walk forward without the slightest hesitation—like I said, a straight line—and then she casually turned her head and stared at the car barreling toward her. I couldn’t help but think about the cult leaders that set-fire, poison and hack their followers into tiny pieces. Those starry-eyed sheep never ever resist much less question what waits ahead. How could all those people forget their heads and get tricked into going out like that? Even smart people aren’t always immune. Her guru, the bastard with the joystick, must be a real sadist marching her across three lanes of traffic like a golem.

And the driver of the Mercedes coming at her—probably thinking she would get out of the way because there was plenty of time. I don’t know; I don’t know what he was thinking. Again, he didn’t. I would have at least laid on the horn. She had two more lanes of steady traffic left to cross and nowhere to go but back to the curb. I saw the driver look at her and she looked at the driver and they both expected the other one to do something, anything, except continue doing what it was they were doing . . . but hey, they didn’t do anything. And that was just it.

Tires squawked. Just enough to slow down to about thirty or forty, then a loud thud. Her hip, I think, came into contact first with the silver grill, causing her to double over the hood. The momentum flipped her entire body up on top of the Mercedes, almost to the windshield. She slowly slumped off the far side of the car. I noticed one of her shoes had rolled across the street next to mine at the curb. The laces were still tied.

And you know, she never went down. The other lanes were still packed with moving cars as she braced herself against the side of the Mercedes and continued forward, all determination.

Shit, I couldn’t believe it. I was stunned, left thinking, a ton of metal just slapped her and she hasn’t snapped back to reality? It seemed like I stood there for a good five minutes with the whole world in freeze-frame. So I dropped my backpack. And when I moved the world started moving again as if it were waiting for my cue to resume its normal spin. I sometimes imagine, If I had stayed still would the rest of the world still be stuck in that moment, unable to go forward?

The Mercedes crept past me with the guy inside and a passenger, his girlfriend or wife from the look of it, yelling and swearing what an idiot he was and how could he hit her when he saw her standing there. The rage in her voice came clearly through their rolled-up windows. But the girl wasn’t standing; she was just walking slowly, thoughtlessly.

I ran over…or, well, I can’t really remember but one moment I was on the curb and the next I was standing over her. She looked at me with full moon eyes and I hesitated to touch her feeling a little embarrassed because she was staring at me like I had a horn sprouting out of my forehead. Actually, she was the one with a large goose egg on the side that bounced off the windshield.

I didn’t let go. Instead I asked her if she was alright. It’s a dumb question considering what she did to herself. Just the same, she didn’t say a thing. I grabbed her arms. She was still staring at me with that ridiculous glare when she grew as soft as a water balloon. And even a body as small as hers is hard to manage when it goes slack. So I struggled at first as she began to go unconscious right there in the middle of the street with the traffic all around. Her body slid down the side of the Mercedes. I was having trouble propping her up on the car so I could get a better hold of her when a guy came over and barked at me to get her off the damn road. And I was trying but she was a dead weight. So I grabbed her shoulders, motioning to him to do the same with her legs, and we shuffled over to a grassy spot near the curb.

Though she wasn’t responding to various voices asking if she was alright, her eyes were open a sliver, which was a good sign I thought. A small crowd of street crossers had gathered around; I could feel their stares as I hovered over her, craning around one another to peer. Someone made the call and before long an ambulance hopped the curb. A female medic along with the three others she directed around asked no one in particular why this woman’s pants zipper was unfastened. It was accusatory and I felt directed at the two of us males who were crouched around her. My face warmed with indignation. I kept silent and let an older female bystander inform the medic that we hadn’t touched her there.

At this point I stood and backed away. I saved her goddamn life and I’m being questioned over sexual harassment? Not that I was fishing for a Thank you from a bunch of strangers for doing what anyone would have done, but I surely didn’t expect accusations like that.

I raised my hand when the female medic asked who the nearest person was to the accident. She wanted the details, details for the record, for the lawyers. I told her everything except for the part about me freezing on the curb and not grabbing her sooner. I’d already been suspected of something I didn’t do, why put any more ideas in this lady’s head? The Mercedes driver was still sitting in his car, on the phone, uninterrogated. Probably talking to the family lawyer. Strategizing ways to keep this off his driving record. His female passenger stared unfocused out her side window with what in any other situation would be a bored expression. I suspect she was experiencing a much milder version of what the girl her husband or boyfriend dented his hood on will have when she comes through.

After giving my contact information and a few brief legal sounding questions, and the ambulance only a noise in the distance I picked up and went to work. I was late to work, but no one noticed. A few days went by before I called the only hospital nearby. I told the receptionist what had happened and the date it happened on, but without a name she snorted when I asked if she recalled the young woman. There were too many patients, I was told.

Then, if anyone died that fit her description. I’d have to identify myself as a family member for that information, she said. Does it count as a rescue if the person saved is already dead by the time you get there? I was the first responder, and I hesitated. I may have been the closest to her but a few feet away ten others never budged.

Just yesterday, an insurance lawyer called. He wanted to know a few details of what happened before the accident. I told him that the medic wrote everything down I had to say, including the phone number he used to call me. He still wanted to go over what happened.

Was she in the street?

She was in the pedestrian crossing.

Was the light green?

Which light?

The one she was crossing against.

Probably, I think.

In your opinion, was she crossing the street illegally?

I’m not answering that. How fast was the car going when it struck her?

I don’t know.

How fast do you think?

I’m not going to try and guess.

How far from her were you?

Right next to her.

When she was hit?

When she was standing on the curb.

Why do you think she crossed the street at that time?

Maybe she was confused.

I asked what her condition was. He didn’t know. I asked her name. He said it was confidential. I told him not to call again. He wished me a good day and ended the call.

I’m sure she’s alive and fine. A cast, a broken hip, a few cracked ribs and a concussion. Why did her shoe come off and zipper come undone? That’s as much a mystery as to why a receptionist from a hospital with suburban in its name failed to recall anything about a pedestrian hit by a car. And why weren’t there any police at the scene? There are those dreams that you confuse with reality for a little while until you remember something strange occurring that seems too implausible to ever have happened.

Ledes

“Rising food prices are proving deadly for the world’s poor.” Common Dreams

The state budget approved only weeks ago is already falling into the red, and lawmakers may be forced to return to Sacramento this month to make emergency spending cuts and take other measures to keep California from running out of cash.” LA Times

Modern market systems can trace their origins to seaborne commerce. And the sea could be a fierce disciplinarian.” Everett Herald

Fears are mounting that many Wall Street banks and financial firms will refuse to participate in the US government’s $700bn bail-out package, leaving global markets and world economies in a perilous state for months to come.” Observer

Nobel Prize for GFP!

MSKGEELFTG VVPVLVELDG DVNGQKFSVS GEGEGDATYG KLTLNFICTT GKLPVPWPTL VTTFSYGVQC FSRYPDHMKQ HDFFKSAMPE GYVQERTIFY KDDGNYKTRA EVKFEGDTLV NRIELKGIDF KEDGNILGHK MEYNYNSHNV YIMGDKPKNG IKVNFKIRHN IKDGSVQLAD HYQQNTPIGD GPVLLPDNHY LSTQSALSKD PNEKRDHMIL LEFVTAARIT HGMDELYK

    1 atgagtaaag gagaagaact tttcactgga gtggtcccag ttcttgttga attagatggc
   61 gatgttaatg ggcaaaaatt ctctgtcagt ggagagggtg aaggtgatgc aacatacgga
  121 aaacttaccc ttaattttat ttgcactact gggaagctac ctgttccatg gccaacactt
  181 gtcactactt tctcttatgg tgttcaatgc ttctcaagat acccagatca tatgaaacag
  241 catgactttt tcaagagtgc catgcccgaa ggttatgtac aggaaagaac tatattttac
  301 aaagatgacg ggaactacaa gacacgtgct gaagtcaagt ttgaaggtga tacccttgtt
  361 aatagaatcg agttaaaagg tattgatttt aaagaagatg gaaacattct tggacacaaa
  421 atggaataca actataactc acataatgta tacatcatgg gagacaaacc aaagaatggc
  481 atcaaagtta acttcaaaat tagacacaac attaaagatg gaagcgttca attagcagac
  541 cattatcaac aaaatactcc aattggcgat ggccctgtcc ttttaccaga caaccattac
  601 ctgtccacac aatctgccct ttccaaagat cccaacgaaa agagagatca catgatcctt
  661 cttgagtttg taacagctgc taggattaca catggcatgg atgaactata caaa

Sidestumping

I’ve found that most intellectuals, amateur or otherwise, reflexively assume that a person’s statements reflect what they think, or at least to the extent that the person is able to express themselves. If that assumption holds true, then I guess it’s perfectly legitimate to do a “close reading” and write for pages and pages about the ideas and the implications.

I’m not so convinced that’s a worthwhile task for the words of a politician. Are his/her statements the product of any deep thought–do we even expect they’ll be consistent between one public appearance and the next?

Those watching last night’s political performance were witness to a dubious debate tactic that assumes a low intelligence across the audience. What worries me is that Obama resorted to this strategy because he saw Palin get away with it–”The tyranny,” as George W. Bush said, “of low expectations.” Not surprisingly, it has a long and glorious history in law schools and debate classes the world over.

Sidestumping: To avoid answering a question by reciting a stump speech that at best is only tenuously related to the question.

Andrew Sullivan stroked himself:

I debated dozens of times at Oxofrd. All I can say is that, simply on terms of substance, clarity, empathy, style and authority, this has not just been an Obama victory. It has been a wipe-out.

Sullivan’s words get in the way of his sentiments, sentiments shared by Cuban revolutionary José Martí in regard to his time with the regime, “I have lived inside the beast and I know its entrails.”

Robot Wisdom 2.0

Nyer’s James Wood notices abusrdity of republicans accusing Obama of saying things.

Hank Fox quits his career job at the newspaper over the soft bigotry of religion.

Is it time for the Freedom Prize for Literature?

University of Toronto Social Psychologist explains what it means to wash away your sins.

For guys, “the early stages of hooking up are more fraught with potential disaster than Gordon Ramsey on ketamine.” Not that women would understand this.

Pickled sharks and iced-out skulls do not an artist make, Damien Hirst.

Rolling Stone Rakes McCain over the rhetorical coals.

A Peoples History of American Empire, a Zinn graphic novel.

Nader’s Class

Reasons are legion, so it’s no secret that the humanist’s choice for president ought be Ralph Nader. His unrefined, rough-hewn visage provides a necessary counterpoint (or alternative) to that oil-slick, Cheshire grinning corporate candidate countenance exemplified in Mitt Romney’s waxen mug. Nader should also be the poor, middle, and perhaps upper middle class choice as well. And why be so classist?

Because greater variance in net worth yields diminishing shared experience, our empathy is in part derived from a shared commonality for our neighbor. Lack of familiarity begets estrangement and eventual alienation. This particular distinction, if it exists, will be conflated by political, religious or other ideological views, and poses a problem for falsifying my hypothesis.

I do have an experiment in mind, and it involves an 80s era movie starring former SNL cast members Dan Aykroyd and Eddie Murphy. Remember, this was before Eddie Murphy went around dressed up in morbidly obese person suits, and Dan Aykroyd’s only connection to the paranormal was starring in Ghostbusters and not peddling quadruple diamond distilled vodka bottled in glass replicas of human skulls (this is the same crystal skull ooga booga Steven Spielberg injected into his latest film, Indiana Jones and the Partial Birth Abortion of My Childhood). The movie in mind is Trading Places. It’s about a filthy rich guy and a filthy poor guy trading places. What in math and science often implies elegance, simple in everything else simply means boring and cliche.

Back to my hypothesis. I was inspired by this mediocre movie to consider what happens when the type of person who typically wins the lotto actually wins the lotto. Considering the awardee falls for the lump sum scam, which can still be in the millions, how are they changed? I was told Oprah did something like this on her show a few years ago. What would happen if we took Oprah’s chef, trainer, chauffeur and walk-in closet away from her? Actually, what Oprah did, if I recall, was air the fallout of a homeless guy who was all at once given far more money than he could manage. But let’s say the guy blew only a sustainable amount on sex and drugs and invested the rest in personal wealth multiplication. Would the same or different mundanities monopolize his conscious thought? I predict different. Not to sound too redundant or syllogistic, but it’s reasonable to assume that that which occupies most of our time and energy is that which is most on our mind. Naturally, we’ll be inclined to select for those who also share our preoccupations and select against those who do not. Dialectically speaking, it’s been show through the Internet, cable news and globalization, the more diverse a culture the greater the tendency to fracture or Balkanize into groups as a way of reinforcing one’s beliefs. We notice similar congruency between emotional patterns and mate selection.

Jennifer Egan mentioned this in passing in the recent New York Times Magazine article, The Bipolar Puzzle, as a possible explanation for the increased susceptibility and intensity of some behavioral disorders in children that are highly heritable. The rags to riches chap would drift away from his former circle of influence–his former in-group might resent him for this and suggest he’s a sell-out chump–and find another more attuned to his new worries–yachting license, amassing art, recovering from plastic surgery, gambling on Wall street, whatever. With that in mind, I’m currently culling the literature for research into the effects of awarding large sums of money to habitually destitute individuals and their overlapping social group affiliations over a period of years.

Nader’s pushing for universal health care, reigning in runaway corporate greed through state and federal regulations, ending our oil dependency and so ending our dependency on oil tyrants both foreign and domestic, increased funding for education, decreased funding for war profiteers, saving social security, regulating credit card companies, establishing a “living wage,” exempting an income tax from those making less than 50k annually. These issues, taken as a whole, are salvo for the ever widening economic gulf in America. The underlying principle states that to raise the quality of life for the nations poor and struggling through the help of the wealthiest, with the state and federal government acting as mediator, generates empathy.

It’s not a particularly new or radical policy–federalizing compassion and state-sponsored humanism. Benjamin Franklin liked the idea, at least in theory, but considered big government unhealthy. Living in the shadow of Reaganomics, it would be interesting to hear what Franklin, if alive today, would have to say on topics such as Enron, Wall Street, Bush, Guantanamo, Iraq, and this years presidential campaign.

The other day, editors at the Washington Post told Nader they weren’t covering his campaign because he wasn’t a serious contender for the White House (notice the self-fulfilling prophecy of so-called independent journalists). Nader replied: “Then why are you covering the Nationals?